Hermenêutica emancipatória na interpretação dos direitos da bio e sócio diversidade na Amazônia e a questão do Protocolo de Nagóia

Abstract

The diversity of the American continent is an invitation for discussions about interactions between its different collectivities, in its multiple dimensions of daily life, such as culture, society, and politics. Brazil is a laboratory in this scenario and challenges researchers in the field of social knowledge. This is mainly due to crises arising from options between political and cultural vectors, conflicts of conflicts in the fields of power, externalized in crimes, spaces, and bodies. An example of these conflict environments in the Amazon region considered a territory not only of biodiversity, but of plurality of existences and ways of life, of systems of systems composed of specific logos of language maintainers, sabers, spiritualities of other substrates that individualize identity regional, without limit or reduction in a context of monoculture, but of coexistence. However, as an epistemological structure for the debate is almost unknown, exported to Latin America and the Amazon: was a theme of Latin American emancipation and participation used in the most recent tests of the Nagoya Protocol? Do elements and their derivations agree with what they interpret in the Latin community of these peoples? Is the institutional system, countries that make up a large part of the Amazon, deliberative about the participation of these specific social rules? Using the phenomenological hermeneutic method, this dissertation is applied to analyze the compatibility of the biographical and socio-environmental dimensions existing in the Nagoya Protocol, using an emancipatory hermeneutic of Amazon logos used in statistics of a substantial nature. To this end, it is intended (1) to identify as hermeneutical interpretative perspectives of emancipatory life for Latin epistemologies in the Amazon; (2) dialoguing a relationship between bio rights and social diversity and international interests in the emancipatory perspective of development in the Amazon as a complex environment in Latin America (3) exposing the skills of interaction and engagement between the themes of the partner and the biodiversity in a substantial democratic perspective; (4) evidence the compatibility between the topics of the Nagoya Protocol and the relevance for Latin America and the Amazon. The dissertation demonstrates that the hermeneutic analysis of instruments that standardize the topic of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge, in their respective social and political context, in the primacy of an emancipatory vision of the rights of socioal and biological diversity in the Amazon, especially with regard to debates on the Nagoya Protocol, it exposes a principled contradiction regarding consensus, consultation and participatory democracy on the paths that such rights should follow, mainly with regard to the deliberation of the interested groups.