Alinhamento múltiplo de seqüências através de técnicas de agrupamento

Abstract

The simultaneous alignment of many DNA or protein sequences is one of the commonest tasks in computational molecular biology. Multiple alignments are important in many applications, such as, predicting the structure of new sequences, demonstrating the relationship between new sequences and existing families of sequences, inferring the evolutionary history of a family of sequences,finding the characteristic motifs (core blocks) between biological sequences, assembling fragments in DNA sequencing, and many others. Currently, the most popular strategy used for solving the multiple sequence alignment problem is the progressive alignment. Each step of this strategy might generate an error which is expected to be low for closely related sequences but increases as sequences diverge. Therefore, determining the order in which the sequences will be aligned is a key step in the progressive alignment strategy. Traditional approaches take into account, in each iteration of the progressive alignment, only the closest pair or groups of sequences to be aligned. Such strategy minimizes the error introduced in each step, but may not be the best option to minimize the final error. Based on that hypothesis, this work aims the study and the application of a global clustering technique to perform a previous analysis of all sequences in order to separate them into groups according to their similarities. These groups, then, guide the traditional progressive alignment, as an attempt to minimize the overall error introduced by the steps of the progressive alignment and improve the final result. To assess the reliability of this new strategy, three well-known methods were modified for the purpose of introducing the new sequence clustering stage. The accuracy of new versions of the methods was tested using three diferent reference collections. Besides, the modified methods were compared with their original versions. Results of the conducted experiments depict that the new versions of the methods with the global clustering stage really obtained better alignments than their original versions in the three reference collections and achieving improvement over the main methods found in literature, with an increase of only 3% on average in the running time.