Atlas Morfossintático da Microrregião do Madeira - AMSIMA

Abstract

This atlas was developed by addressing the morphosyntactic level, under the criteria of multidimensional Dialectology and Variationist Sociolinguistics, in order to record the speeches of the five counties belonging to the micro-region of the Madeira River, namely Borba, Novo Aripuanã, Manicoré, Apuí and Humaitá. In order to obtain the data, the Morphosyntactic Questionnaire (QMS) was applied, which presented 49 questions, elaborated for the accomplishment of the Brazilian Linguistic Atlas (ALIB) and recording of free elocutions. The informants' profile was established according to the Amazon Linguistic Atlas – ALAM (CRUZ, 2010: in each municipality, six informants were interviewed, totaling thirty (30), being a man and a woman in three age groups: from 18 to 35 years old, from 36 to 55 years old and 56 years old and older, all born in the counties surveyed, with parents and partners also born in the region, illiterate or with schooling until the 5th grade of elementary school, with good phonation condition and that were not absent more than 1/3 of their life of the locality. For the production of the 134 morphosyntactic letters, a computer program called SGVCLin, developed by SEABRA, ROMANO & OLIVEIRA, 2015, was used to store and map the collected data, which, in general, allowed verification of non-performance of articles regarding proper names of children/siblings and neighbors. Ten plural nouns were presented to the informants to verify the number variation. In this case, the placement of "UNS" before the nouns was verified in greater number. The data also allowed us to observe the realization of the use of some pronouns such as "MIM", performed before the verb instead of "EU". It also allowed to check the use of "VOCÊ" in the subject position instead of "TU". Between "NÓS" and "A GENTE”, it was verified the greatest achievement of "A GENTE". And, to summon one more person to sit at the table, there was the greater occurrence of "COM NÓS" instead of "CONOSCO". As far as the realization of the time of the verbs, it was verified the accomplishment of this grammar class in the present times and preterite perfect of the indicative, but it was not verified the realization in the future of the present and future of the indicative. Upon verbal agreement of FAZ/FAZEM, all informants carried out "FAZ" for the indication of time. And, as for the use of "Não" in negative answers, the placement before and after the verb was verified, for example "Eu não tenho medo, não."